Meetings and Review Specifications

Team Collaboration Standards

Team collaboration standards are key to ensuring code consistency and maintainability during multi-person collaborative development. Frontend projects typically involve multiple developers working simultaneously, and the lack of unified standards can lead to code chaos and frequent conflicts.

Unified Code Style

Use ESLint and Prettier to enforce a unified code style. Configuration example:

// .eslintrc.js
module.exports = {
  extends: ['airbnb', 'prettier'],
  rules: {
    'react/jsx-filename-extension': [1, { extensions: ['.js', '.jsx'] }],
    'import/no-unresolved': 'off'
  }
};

// .prettierrc
{
  "semi": true,
  "singleQuote": true,
  "tabWidth": 2
}

Git Workflow

Adopt the Git Flow branching model:

• main: Production environment code
• develop: Integration development branch
• feature/xxx: Feature development branch
• hotfix/xxx: Emergency fix branch

Commit message standards:

feat: Add user login feature
fix: Resolve button click issue
docs: Update README documentation

Component Development Standards

1. Atomic Design Principles:

   • Atoms: Basic components like buttons, input fields
   • Molecules: Composite components like forms, navigation bars
   • Organisms: Complete functional blocks

2. Component Example:

// Button.jsx
import PropTypes from 'prop-types';
import styles from './Button.module.scss';

const Button = ({ children, variant = 'primary', ...props }) => (
  <button className={`${styles.button} ${styles[variant]}`} {...props}>
    {children}
  </button>
);

Button.propTypes = {
  children: PropTypes.node.isRequired,
  variant: PropTypes.oneOf(['primary', 'secondary', 'danger'])
};

Meeting and Review Standards

Effective meetings and code reviews significantly improve code quality and team collaboration efficiency.

Daily Standup

1. Duration: No more than 15 minutes
2. Content:
   • Work completed yesterday
   • Work planned for today
   • Blocking issues encountered
3. Rules:
   • Stand to maintain efficiency
   • Avoid deep technical discussions
   • Record issues for separate discussions

Requirement Review Meeting

1. Pre-meeting preparation:
   • Product manager sends requirement documents 24 hours in advance
   • Team members read and mark questions beforehand
2. Meeting focus:
   • Feasibility assessment of requirements
   • Technical solution discussions
   • Workload estimation
3. Output:
   • Confirmed requirement documents
   • Draft technical solution
   • Scheduling plan

Code Review Standards

1. Basic checklist:

   • Does the code comply with standards?
   • Are there obvious performance issues?
   • Is test coverage达标?
   • Is documentation updated?

2. Review example:

// Before improvement
function getUserData(id) {
  return fetch(`/api/user/${id}`)
    .then(res => res.json())
    .then(data => {
      console.log(data);
      return data;
    });
}

// Suggested improvement
async function getUserData(id) {
  try {
    const response = await fetch(`/api/user/${id}`);
    if (!response.ok) throw new Error('Network response was not ok');
    return await response.json();
  } catch (error) {
    console.error('Fetch error:', error);
    throw error;
  }
}

3. Review process:
   • Create a Pull Request
   • Add at least 2 reviewers
   • Resolve all comments before merging
   • Use resolve conversation to mark resolved issues

Technical Solution Review

1. Review content:

   • Rationality of architecture design
   • Basis for third-party library selection
   • Performance optimization measures
   • Compatibility considerations
   • Error handling mechanisms

2. Solution example:

## State Management Solution Selection

### Requirement Background
- Application needs to manage complex global state
- Multiple components need to share state
- Need to support time-travel debugging

### Solution Comparison
| Solution    | Advantages               | Disadvantages          |
|-------------|--------------------------|------------------------|
| Redux       | Mature ecosystem, time-travel | Boilerplate code     |
| MobX        | Simple to write, reactive | Too magical, hard to debug |
| Context API | Native support, lightweight | Performance issues   |

### Recommended Solution
Use Redux Toolkit to simplify Redux usage:
1. Reduce boilerplate code
2. Built-in Immer for immutable data
3. Full TypeScript support

Retrospective Meeting

1. Frequency: Every two weeks
2. Process:
   • List major work completed during the period
   • Identify what went well
   • Find areas for improvement
   • Develop specific improvement measures
3. Example output:
   • Good practices: Code review response time reduced to within 4 hours
   • Areas for improvement: Increase test coverage from 65% to 80%
   • Action items: Add unit test training sessions

Documentation Standards

Comprehensive documentation reduces onboarding costs for new members and ensures knowledge transfer.

Project README

Essential content structure:

# Project Name

## Project Introduction
- Feature overview
- Technology stack description

## Development Environment
1. Node version: 14.x
2. Install dependencies: `npm install`
3. Start command: `npm start`

## Build and Deployment
- Staging environment: `npm run build:staging`
- Production environment: `npm run build:prod`

## Code Standards
- ESLint rules
- Commit message format

Component Documentation

Use Storybook or custom documentation:

// Button.stories.jsx
import Button from './Button';

export default {
  title: 'Components/Button',
  component: Button,
};

const Template = (args) => <Button {...args} />;

export const Primary = Template.bind({});
Primary.args = {
  children: 'Primary Button',
  variant: 'primary'
};

API Documentation Standards

Use Swagger or similar tools:

paths:
  /api/user/{id}:
    get:
      tags:
        - User
      parameters:
        - name: id
          in: path
          required: true
          schema:
            type: string
      responses:
        '200':
          description: User information
          content:
            application/json:
              schema:
                $ref: '#/components/schemas/User'

Quality Assurance Measures

Automated Testing

1. Unit test example (Jest):

// utils.test.js
import { formatDate } from './utils';

describe('formatDate', () => {
  it('formats ISO date string correctly', () => {
    const result = formatDate('2023-05-15T00:00:00Z');
    expect(result).toBe('May 15, 2023');
  });

  it('handles invalid date', () => {
    const result = formatDate('invalid-date');
    expect(result).toBe('Invalid date');
  });
});

2. E2E test (Cypress):

// login.spec.js
describe('Login', () => {
  it('successfully logs in', () => {
    cy.visit('/login');
    cy.get('#username').type('testuser');
    cy.get('#password').type('password123');
    cy.get('button[type="submit"]').click();
    cy.url().should('include', '/dashboard');
  });
});

Continuous Integration

GitHub Actions configuration example:

name: CI Pipeline

on: [push, pull_request]

jobs:
  test:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v2
      - uses: actions/setup-node@v2
        with:
          node-version: '14'
      - run: npm ci
      - run: npm test
      - run: npm run build

  lint:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v2
      - uses: actions/setup-node@v2
      - run: npm ci
      - run: npm run lint

Tools and Resource Configuration

Recommended Development Tools

1. Editor configuration:

   • VS Code recommended plugins:
     • ESLint
     • Prettier
     • EditorConfig
     • GitLens

2. Debugging tools:

   • React Developer Tools
   • Redux DevTools
   • Chrome Performance Monitor

Team Knowledge Base

1. Content categories:

   • Architecture Decision Records (ADR)
   • Frequently Asked Questions
   • Best Practice Guides
   • Learning Resources

2. ADR example:

# 2023-05-01 Adopting TypeScript

## Status
Adopted

## Background
JavaScript type issues caused multiple production environment bugs

## Decision
Starting from Q2 2023, all new projects will use TypeScript

## Impact
- Initial learning curve
- Additional workload for type definitions
- Long-term maintenance cost reduction